Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01411
Original file (BC 2014 01411.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-01411	
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to 
honorable.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

For the last 62 years he has worked faithfully caring for himself 
and his family and has lived as an upstanding citizen.  He has 
spent 30 years with the Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company in 
California.  

As an 18-year-old boy, he did not adjust to military life and he 
now wishes to have his discharge changed to honorable so that he 
may have access to all Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) 
benefits.  

The failure to timely file the application should be waived in the 
interest of justice since he has been getting veterans benefits 
for house insurance through the United States Automobile 
Association; however, they have changed their policy and no longer 
accept anything other than an honorable discharge.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 10 Jan 51, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.

According to a letter from the Ward Officer, Neuropsychiatric 
Service, dated 26 Mar 52, on 29 Aug 51, (while on leave) the 
applicant fell from a horse and received a fractured skull and 
brain concussion for which he was hospitalized.  The letter also 
states that on 13 Dec 51, he crashed into a door then dashed out 
into the cold winter night without the appropriate clothing.  

On 2 Jan 52, he was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of 
Dissociative Reaction, fugue state, post-traumatic.  

On 14 May 52, the applicant was notified a Board of Officers would 
convene to consider whether or not he should be discharged prior 
to expiration of the terms of service under the provisions of AFR 
39-16, Discharge for Unsuitability, paragraph 4a (2).

On 20 Jun 52, he acknowledged receipt of the Report of Proceedings 
of the Board which stated that he was unsuitable for further 
military service because of character and behavior disorders. 

On 20 Jun 52, the applicant received a general discharge and was 
credited with 1 year, 5 months, and 11 days of active service.

According to AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, 
dated 9 Jul 2004, paragraph 5.11, Conditions that Interfere with 
Military Service, Airman may be discharged for physical or mental 
conditions when the commander determines the condition interferes 
with assignment or duty performance.  Table 1.3, Rule 3, states 
that the type of separation authorized for conditions that 
interfere with military service is an honorable discharge.

On 28 Apr 14, a clemency bulletin was sent to the applicant for 
review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C).  As of this date, 
no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate 
the existence of an injustice.  After reviewing the evidence of 
record, it appears that his separation was proper and in 
compliance with the appropriate regulations in effect at the time.  
However, we note that, under today’s standards, the applicant 
would in all likelihood have received an honorable discharge.  
Therefore, it is our opinion that corrective action is appropriate 
and we recommend that his discharge be upgraded as indicated 
below.  


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 20 Jun 52, 
he was discharged with service characterized as honorable.


All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2014-01411 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 31 Mar 2014, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Information Bulletin

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01555

    Original file (BC 2014 01555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01555 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be changed to honorable. On 28 Apr 14, a request for post-service information was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit c). In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02764

    Original file (BC-2004-02764.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02764 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded. He was credited with 3 years, 7 months, and 4 days active service (excludes 197 days of lost time due to three periods of confinement). They also noted applicant did not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00302

    Original file (BC-2003-00302.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 31 Jan 51 and was assigned to the 6351st Medical Squadron at Naha Air Base. Apparently, however, he was reassigned again and, on 12 May 53, his squadron requested his transfer to the rehabilitation squadron because of his unresponsiveness to repeated counseling, correction and discipline. The applicant was discharged in the grade of airman basic under the provisions of AFR 39-17 (Unfitness) on 16 Jul 54 with an undesirable characterization...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02991

    Original file (BC 2014 02991.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02991 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. (Administratively corrected via DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, dated 7 Dec 73.) On 6 Oct 72, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge, and was credited...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00380

    Original file (BC-2011-00380.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00380 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation of “Conditions that interfere with military service-not disability-character and behavior disorder” be changed to a medical discharge. The applicant offered a conditional waiver of his rights associated with an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02218

    Original file (BC 2014 02218.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02218 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. He was credited with 3 years, 4 months and 25 days of active service. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to recommend granting...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01045

    Original file (BC-2005-01045.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPFF advised the applicant that since his name change occurred after his separation, his records properly reflect his name relative to his period of service. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 23 August 1955, he was honorably discharged and issued an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02864

    Original file (BC 2014 02864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02864 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. On 30 Mar 84, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge, and was credited with 2 years, 9 months, and 9 days of active service. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02968

    Original file (BC-2004-02968.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her personality disorder, the primary diagnosis, was considered unsuiting for military service warranting administrative discharge from the Air Force. The applicant was administratively discharged for unsuitability due to personality disorder. Review of the mental health memorandum and personnel record does not disclose any evidence to support correction of records from an administrative discharge for personality disorder to another reason.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01411

    Original file (BC-2012-01411.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, they asked for copies of AF Form 422, AF Form 109, and AF Form 469 or a memorandum from her primary care manager stating what her exemption should have been at that time; however, she failed to provide the requested documents. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28 Aug 12 for review and...